Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
‼️ What exactly is the partner of the notorious Ruslan Cherkassky—Mariya Tryfonova—suspected of?!
📄 Mariya Tryfonova’s actions have been qualified under part 3 of Article 28 and part 2 of Article 321-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. She is suspected of organizing the distribution of falsified medicinal products as part of an organized group. The investigation believes that Ms. Tryfonova organized the distribution, in particular through a clinic where she is the medical director, and through promotional events.
👀 Especially telling is the main thesis of her defense: since tirzepatide was not registered in Ukraine, products containing it allegedly cannot be considered falsified medicinal products, and therefore the elements of the crime under Articles 321-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine are absent.
🤷♂️ The logic, to say the least, is peculiar: if a drug is registered—then it can be falsified, but if it is not registered—then, according to the defense, the very problem of falsification mysteriously disappears.
🤡 Tryfonova’s lawyers are not basing their main position on the simple claim: “She didn’t sell anything.” The argument is far more ambitious: even if such products were sold, they allegedly cannot constitute a criminal offense at all because the proper object of the crime is missing.
😎 It very much appears that the lawyers are trying to find a legal construction under which the mere absence of product registration would automatically exclude criminal liability for its falsification and distribution.
Telegram | ADMIN