Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
🌀 This morning I read on Ihor Mosiychuk’s page: he filed a lawsuit with the Administrative Cassation Court within the Supreme Court demanding that Decree No.946/2026, by which Zelensky assigned the duties of Prosecutor General to Anton Kovalsky, be declared illegal.
For me this is not a sensation.
On 17 September, the very day Zelensky’s decree appeared, I in fact — within a few hours — published a long piece “Loyalty Instead of Legitimacy,” in which I raised the question of the lawfulness of precisely such an appointment.
So I didn’t notice the problem five days later, when it became the subject of a lawsuit. I noticed it on the day of the decision.
And already on 21 September the Center for Political and Legal Reforms in its legal analysis explicitly wrote that the acting Prosecutor General was appointed “in an unconstitutional manner.”
Today, on 23 September, the matter has reached the Supreme Court.
For an analyst, this is probably the best test of the job: to spot a problem when almost no one cares yet — before it becomes the subject of litigation and a news headline.
Now let’s see what legal assessment the Supreme Court will give. Especially considering that Mudra no longer manipulates judges... Although other methods of pressure and unknown names have not been abolished🔥
My piece from 17 September:
[Loyalty Instead of Legitimacy — video on YouTube](https://youtu.be/rxxTpv0za-s?utm_source=chatgpt.com))
Telegram publication
