Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
Why did journalists see the main bank in the collateral scheme for Galushchenko, but NABU did not? — Kulik
In the case of the 150 million UAH collateral for Herman Galushchenko, there is a detail political scientist Vitaliy Kulik drew attention to after Babel’s investigation. According to the journalists, the cash was first funneled through an entire network of companies and individual entrepreneurs and accumulated in one bank — PUMB. It was there that the full amount was initially assembled, which was later used to post the collateral.
Only after that did the money begin to be distributed to other banks.
In this chain Sense Bank was not the only bank and certainly not the main one. It turned out to be one of four banks through which funds passed at the subsequent stage, together with PUMB, OTP Bank and Idea Bank.
Yet Sense Bank became the focus of NABU’s public communications, and its top managers were charged with suspicions.
Kulik points to an obvious question: if journalists were able, from documents, to reconstruct the movement of the money and see where the full amount was initially accumulated, why didn’t NABU see this?
INSIDER UA | Send content