Eng
Укр
Back
Original version
Bankova Mail 100

At present there is not a single faction in parliament that has a positive balance of assessments (that is, in the case...

14.10.2026, 18:52 Bankova Mail ↗

Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.

At present there is not a single faction in parliament that has a positive balance of assessments (that is, in the case of all factions there are more people who believe that its activities hinder rather than contribute to the country’s development). In fact, Ukrainians believe that parliament more likely hinders than contributes to the country’s development. Of course, Ukrainians’ critical attitude toward the Verkhovna Rada and parliamentary political forces is not a new phenomenon. For example, according to a KMIS survey in December 2018, only 8% of Ukrainians trusted the Verkhovna Rada, while 80% did not trust it (the trust-distrust balance was -72 percentage points). But during the war such a situation is especially alarming.

It is particularly critical that for the Servant of the People faction, which is the basis of the coalition and the current authorities, those who believe its actions hinder development outnumber those who believe it promotes development by three to one.

— KMIS Director Anton Grushetskyi

Subscribe: Bankova Mail

Follow us on X

Top on the site

Screenshot of a Telegram post: At present there is not a single faction in parliament that has a positive bala…

Наразі у парламенті немає жодної фракції, яка би мала позитивний баланс оцінок (тобто у випадку всіх фракцій більше тих, хто вважає, що її діяльність перешкоджає, а не сприяє розвитку країни). Фактично, українці вважають, що парламент скоріше перешкоджає, ніж сприяє розвитку країни. Звісно, критичне ставлення українців до Верховної Ради та парламентських політичних сил не є новим явищем. Так, наприклад, за результатами опитування КМІС у грудні 2018 року, Верховній Раді довіряли лише 8% українців, тоді як не довіряли 80% (баланс довіри-недовіри становив -72 відсоткові пункти). Але під час війни така ситуація є особливо тривожною.

Особливо критично, що у випадку фракції «Слуги народу», яка є основою коаліції і нинішньої влади, тих, хто вважає, що вона своїми діями перешкоджає розвитку, утричі більше ніж тих, хто вважає, що сприяє розвитку.

— директор КМІС Антон Грушецький

Підписуйтесь: Bankova Mail

Підписуйтесь на нас в Х

Головне на сайті

Screenshot of a Telegram post: Наразі у парламенті немає жодної фракції, яка би мала позитивний баланс оцінок…
Download Download proof

Other channel publications

Scanned Telegram publication

🤔Poroshenko is regarded as the leader of the opposition — that is the view his media are trying to promote using data from the KMIS survey, to which Poroshenko’s supporters added this question; however, if you look at the data from the sociological group “Rating,” Poroshenko tops the distrust ranking — 70% of Ukrainians do not trust him In addition, it is interesting that among the candidates proposed by KMIS there is not a single representative of the Holos party; instead, Serhiy Prytula and O...
Scanned Telegram publication

👀The head of UDAR in the Kyiv City Council, Myroslava Smirnova, decided to defend her “boss” Vitali Klitschko and attacked MP Maryana Bezuhla. While Klitschko was fending off Bezuhla and her placards in the Rada and blaming the central government for the capital’s troubles, Smirnova decided to accuse the MP of indifference to matters in Obolon, from which she won a seat in the Rada. Subscribe: Bankova Mail Follow us on X Top on the site
Scanned Telegram publication

👀📊"European Solidarity" of Poroshenko is trying to demonstrate public support for the political force via a KMIS survey Thus, in the new study "European Solidarity" received the most positive ratings among parliamentary factions - 38%. However, notably, the share of people who consider the faction's activity harmful is larger - 43%. There is as much negativity, for example, toward the former "OPZZh." It is also interesting that this question was added to the KMIS survey at the request of the N...
Scanned Telegram publication

🇺🇸🗳️For the first time in 20 years, the United States refused to invite OSCE observers to the midterm elections The OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights and the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly called the Trump administration's decision "regrettable." Since 2002, the United States had regularly invited OSCE observers to monitor and report on midterm and presidential elections. Subscribe: Bankova Mail Follow us on X Top on the site