Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
⚡️Who will investigate NABU itself? Ihor Chalenko commented on the situation around “Carthage 2.0.”
⭕️The political analyst notes: after the high-profile searches and the released recordings, NABU and SAP are left with a lot of questions that no one is rushing to answer.
For example, what actually happened with Osipov’s case? When was it opened, were there attempts to close it, and who might have been behind that? And most importantly — if detectives knew about possible crimes long ago, why didn’t they stop them earlier?
But there is an even more interesting point. What about the cases against the heads of the anti-corruption agencies themselves? Why did the State Bureau of Investigations close the proceeding against NABU Director Semen Kryvonos? What is happening with the investigations related to SAP head Oleksandr Klymenko? And wasn’t there pressure on those who began checking the anti-corruption officials?
If there is evidence of crimes, everyone must be held accountable, regardless of position. But then why can’t the same uncomfortable questions be asked of NABU and SAP that they ask others?
The political analyst proposes to independently verify these cases so that none of the parties can influence the results.
⭕️While law enforcement agencies sort out their differences, people are watching new scandals, searches, and accusations. And here one wants to understand: who will finally take on resolving this problem?
Subscribe to Times of Ukraine
Telegram publication
