Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
On its page in posts, the Anti-Corruption Action Center (AntAC) is outraged that the suspects in the case leaked data from the “Safe City” database to the perpetrators of the beatings.
And what is this then?
On 4 November (on the day searches were carried out and suspicions were served) at 12.43 o’clock, that is only a few hours after the start of the investigative actions, AntAC posted photos of the case’s suspects on its Telegram — SBU officers Kovalchuk, Kravchuk, and Duka.
And what is that if not a leak?
These photos are not just pictures from the internet; they are F1-form photos.
Access to the database that stores such photos is held by NABU detectives.
All of this is leaks.
And leaks are not good or bad, virtuous or unvirtuous.
Leaks from a case are leaks.
And nothing else.
You are no different from those you yourselves write about.
All those “according to sources in law enforcement,” publishing people’s surnames before investigative actions are completed, coming to the scenes of searches together with detectives, obtaining and publishing court information about suretors — none of this has anything to do with the process or with the law.
Telegram publication
