Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
In this issue you should consider not only immediate benefits but also the costs in the long run
Trust the reliable — subscribe to Telegraf in Google News
Choosing a heating system affects not only the level of comfort in the home but also future electricity bills. At first glance, it may seem that a heat pump and infrared panels are not very different, since in both cases they operate on electricity.
However, their operating principles, installation costs, and running costs have significant differences. More details were explained by the kb.pl publication.
How a heat pump works
A heat pump extracts energy from the surrounding environment — air, soil, or water — and transfers it into the home heating system. This allows it to produce much more heat than the electricity it consumes.
The most popular are air-source heat pumps, although there are also ground- and water-source models. Such a system works best in conjunction with low-temperature heating, for example warm floors, and good building insulation.
How infrared heating works
Infrared panels heat not the air in the room, but the surfaces that infrared radiation hits: walls, floors, furniture, and people. In terms of feel, it resembles sunshine warmth.
Panels can be wall-mounted or ceiling-mounted, and some also serve a decorative function — for example, they can look like a mirror or a painting.
Their installation is usually easier than installing a full heat pump system. In addition, they provide a quick sense of warmth right after switching on.
Cost of installing the system
Installing a heat pump requires substantial initial investment. Especially expensive may be a ground-source system, which requires setting up a heat source.
Additional costs may arise during heating system upgrades or when installing underfloor heating.
Infrared panels have a much lower barrier to entry. Their purchase and installation are cheaper, and installation typically does not require major construction work.
Electricity consumption
This is where another fundamental difference between the two systems appears. Heat pumps have a high COP efficiency coefficient. In many systems it exceeds 4, meaning 1 kWh of electricity can provide about 4 kWh of heat.
Infrared panels practically convert consumed electricity into heat without using additional energy from air, soil, or water. Therefore, to achieve a similar heating effect they usually require more electricity.
As a result, heating costs with infrared panels can be higher, especially in houses with large heat losses.
At the same time, both systems can be combined with solar panels. On-site electricity generation can reduce heating operating costs.
As a reminder, Telegraf previously explained how to prepare a multi-story building for the worst winter scenario without power, heat, or connectivity.
Document: PDF proof of the original version of the news item "Миттєва економія vs довготривала вигода: яку систему опалення обрати – тепловий насос чи інфрачервоні панелі". It records the publication content at the moment of the first scan, the preservation date and the source: Telegraf.
