Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
House at the in-laws, a loan of 40 thousand dollars and a BMW for 2,35 million hryvnias: what the declarations of Bukovina prosecutor Artem Yas hide
Declarations of the head of the Chernihiv regional prosecutor's office Artem Yas for 2021–2025 years contain a number of circumstances that require thorough verification. We are talking about using real estate registered to relatives, discrepancies in the value of cars, financial transactions with his father, inheritance, assistance from the German state, and investments in real estate and foreign assets.
Taken together, these facts raise questions not only about the completeness of asset declarations, but also about the origin of funds, the real value of assets, and the alignment of expenditures with declared income.
House near Kyiv exists, but the prosecutor himself is not among the users
The declaration for 2025 year states that since 11 October 2025 year wife of Artem Yas, Anna, and their two minor sons — Andrii and Vsevolod — have the right to free use of a house measuring 200 square meters and a land plot of 786 square meters in Bilhorodka village, Bucha district, Kyiv region.
Artem Yas himself is not among the users of this property. At the same time, in the declaration he lists a registered residence in Kyiv, while his actual residence is in a rented apartment of 40 square meters in Chernivtsi.
The house, according to available information, is registered to the prosecutor’s father-in-law, Andriy Tymofiiovych Tkachenko. His approximate market value may be from 4,5 to 7 million hryvnias.
Such a situation raises a simple question: does the head of the oblast prosecutor actually use this house, and is it properly reflected in the declaration? If he actually resides in or regularly uses real estate registered to a relative, the relevant circumstances must be checked for compliance with declaration requirements.
This is not the only property in the family whose registration raises questions.
An apartment of 100,2 square meters on Feodosiyivska Street is registered to the prosecutor’s mother-in-law, Olena Vasylivna Tkachenko. According to available information, the family used it even after its purchase in 2016 year, but for a long time this property was not properly reflected in declarations. As an object of free residence, the apartment began to be noted later — after public protests near the Office of the General Prosecutor in 2020 year.
It is important to determine when exactly the right to use the apartment arose, who actually lived there, and whether the information in the declarations matched the circumstances in each reporting year.
Toyota and Lexus: why the cost of cars in declarations changed retroactively
Certain questions arise regarding the cost of Yas family cars.
28 July 2023 year Artem Yas bought a Toyota Land Cruiser 150. In the declaration for 2023 year the car value was listed at 1,68 million hryvnias, while the transaction amount, according to available data, was 2,02 million hryvnias. The difference is about 336,6 thousand hryvnias.
In declarations for 2024 and 2025 years the Toyota value is already shown at 2,02 million hryvnias. At the same time, the question of why the initial amount differed from the transaction price and whether corrected information was filed for 2023 year remains open.
A similar pattern is seen with the Lexus RX 300, purchased by the prosecutor’s wife 23 in June 2021 year. In declarations for 2021–2023 years its value was 1,28 million hryvnias. In the declaration for 2024 year it rose to 1,54 million hryvnias — by 256 thousand hryvnias more.
A change in asset value by itself does not prove violation. However, the reasons for such discrepancies must be corroborated by documents: purchase agreements, payment documents, and explanations for changes to declarations.
Loan of 40 thousand dollars, sale of property to father, and inheritance
Particular attention should be paid to financial transactions between Artem Yas, his wife, and the prosecutor’s father Oleksandr Oleksiyovych Yas — a former deputy prosecutor of Chernihiv region who came under a de–moratorium.
1 June 2021 year the prosecutor’s wife received an interest-free loan from him in the amount of 40 thousand U.S. dollars.
In 2023 year Artem Yas declared the sale of movable property to his father for 925 thousand hryvnias. In the declaration for 2024 year it is stated that the loan debt of 40 thousand dollars was forgiven. Its amount was reflected in the declaration as 1,68 million hryvnias.
In 2025 year new information appeared: Artem Yas declared an inheritance from his father amounting to 1,28 million hryvnias, as well as an inherited apartment in Chernihiv measuring 106,9 square meters.
These transactions form a chain of family financial interactions that require comprehensive verification. It is important to determine from what incomes the father could lend 40 thousand dollars, under what terms the sale of property and loan forgiveness occurred, and whether the source and movement of funds are supported by documents.
Without checking primary documents, it is impossible to claim these operations were fictitious or used to hide money origins. But their sequence and large sums provide enough basis for targeted financial analysis.
Germany assistance against significant cash reserves
In declarations for 2022 and 2023 years Anna Yas, Artem Yas’s wife, reported receiving social assistance from the Federal Employment Agency of Germany. The total amount of payments, according to the stated information, was 813,7 thousand hryvnias.
Meanwhile, the family had substantial cash savings: cash in U.S. dollars ranging from 78 to 96 thousand dollars, and also from 10 to 24 thousand euros.
The fact of savings does not by itself prove illegal receipt of social assistance. To draw that conclusion one must know exactly what type of assistance the wife received, the eligibility rules in her case, and what information the family provided to German authorities.
However, substantial cash reserves alongside receiving social assistance is a circumstance that warrants documentary verification. It is necessary to determine whether the family met the eligibility criteria and whether all circumstances relevant to the payments were properly disclosed.
Three real estate objects and questions about their value
7 March 2025 year the wife of Artem Yas received property rights to three unfinished construction objects in Sofiyivska Borochhivka: apartments of 47,1 and 38,9 square meters, and a parking space of 12,5 square meters. Total area of the objects is 98,5 square meters.
Developer is listed as LLC Concept Time. The declaration also lists financial obligations to LLC Weimut Town Building in the amount of 800 thousand and 560 thousand hryvnias — total 1,36 million hryvnias.
If you relate this sum to the total area of the three objects, it comes to about 13,8 thousand hryvnias per square meter, or roughly 330 dollars per square meter. This calculation is only preliminary: the parking space and apartment areas do not necessarily have the same market value, and the amount of financial obligations is not always identical to the final purchase price.
At the same time, the obtained figure seems low enough to require an independent valuation. Experts should determine the market value of rights to the apartments and parking space in Sofiyivska Borochhivka, the right to use the Bilohorodka house, and check costs of repairs and furnishing if these expenditures affect the assessment of the estate.
Without such an appraisal, one cannot make a final conclusion about undervaluation. But ignoring a significant discrepancy between declared obligations and probable market price of real estate is not advisable.
BMW for 2,35 million hryvnias and almost unchanged cash
2 July 2025 year the prosecutor’s wife purchased a BMW X4 xDrive 20i for 2,35 million hryvnias.
Against the background of the car purchase, the rights to three real estate objects and investments in foreign securities, attention should also be paid to the dynamics of family savings. At the end of 2025 year the declaration lists 87 thousand dollars and 24 thousand euros in cash.
Maintaining a large amount of cash savings after major purchases is not automatic proof of violation. A complete picture requires correlating both spouses’ incomes, the value of acquired assets, actual payments, loans, and other financial operations for the period.
Such an analysis will allow determining whether family expenditures and savings align with declared sources of income.
Account in Lithuania and investments in foreign companies
In the declaration for 2025 year there is also an account in the Lithuanian financial company UAB Maneuver LT and securities of foreign companies. Among the assets are Amazon, Grab Holdings, Uber, Charles Schwab, and BlackRock — companies connected to various sectors of the international market.
Having foreign financial assets by itself does not indicate a violation. However, for a official of such a level it is important to verify the completeness of declaring accounts and securities, as well as compliance with reporting deadlines for opening a foreign currency account abroad if the account was subject to such requirements.
In particular, it is necessary to establish the legal status of the account with UAB Maneuver LT, the date of its opening, the nature of the financial institution, and whether the declarant was obliged to report this account to NAPC within the legally defined period. Separately, it is necessary to check whether all foreign securities and related income are properly reflected in the declaration.
In this case it is important not to limit oneself to the mere existence of an account or shares. A documentary check of reporting deadlines, completeness of information, and correspondence of declared assets with financial documents is required.
Wife’s work in DBR and risk of institutional conflict of interest
Another aspect relates to the professional activity of the prosecutor’s wife. Since 2023 year Anna Yas has worked in the State Bureau of Investigation. In 2024–2025 years her declared salary exceeded 2 million hryvnias.
DBR has authority to investigate, in particular, certain criminal offenses related to the work of law enforcement officers and prosecutors. Therefore, combining the wife’s work in this body with her husband’s position in the oblast prosecutor’s office requires assessment from the standpoint of potential conflicts of interest, operational independence, and the presence of appropriate safeguards.
The fact of spouses working in different law enforcement bodies does not by itself indicate a violation. However, if there is overlap of official powers or if any proceedings arise, it is necessary to verify whether safeguards against conflicts of interest were observed and whether any circumstances could affect the independence of official decisions.
What NAPC should check
The stated circumstances do not replace official checks and do not by themselves establish Artem Yas’s guilt or that of family members. However, they are sufficient to raise concrete questions to the authorized bodies about the accuracy of declarations, the source of funds, and the value of assets.
First, it is necessary to:
conduct monitoring of Artem Yas’s lifestyle and a full check of his declarations for 2021–2025 years;
check his wife’s declarations, who works in the DBR, and compare declared income with asset purchases and financial assets;
obtain information about income from the State Register of Individuals — taxpayers for the period from 1998 year regarding the father-in-law Andriy Tkachenko, mother-in-law Olena Tkachenko, and father Oleksandr Yas, to assess their financial ability to provide large loans and purchase real estate;
engage certified court experts and evaluators to determine the market value of rights to the apartments and parking space in Sofiyivska Borochhivka, the right to use the Bilohorodka house, and to verify the cost of repairs and furnishing if such expenses matter for the assessment of wealth;
check compliance with NAPC requirements to report an account in UAB Maneuver LT and declare foreign securities;
establish actual circumstances of using the Bilohorodka house and verify the completeness of information about real estate in accordance with Article 46 of the Law of Ukraine “On Preventing Corruption”;
check the circumstances of receiving social assistance in Germany, including the type of payments, eligibility conditions and the information the family provided to the relevant authorities;
in case of signs of violations, transmit materials to the appropriate prosecutor’s offices and to the Qualification-Disciplinary Commission of Prosecutors for evaluation within their powers.
It is not about one car, one apartment, or a single financial operation. It is about a chain of wealth and financial circumstances that must be cross-checked: from using property registered to relatives to a loan of 40 thousand dollars, loan forgiveness, inheritance, car purchases, and investments abroad.
NAPC should not give a formal reply, but a full documentary check. If all transactions have a legal explanation and are supported by documents, that should be established. If the check reveals false declarations, unjustified assets, or other violations, the materials should receive proper legal evaluation, regardless of the declarant’s position.
Document: PDF proof of the original version of the news item "Будинок на тестя, позика на 40 тисяч доларів і BMW за 2,35 мільйона гривень: що приховують декларації прокурора Буковини Артема Яся". It records the publication content at the moment of the first scan, the preservation date and the source: ANTIKOR.
