Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
A separate opinion by Supreme Court judge Mazur has appeared in the registry in the case of former judge Pavlo Vovk.
https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/140231227
Another confirmation of the illegality of using covert investigative methods in disciplinary proceedings.
It's the perfect time for the assembly of stupid raimovtsi from the High Council of Justice to write another article on this topic and post it on Maselko's Facebook.
Despite all the pressure from the anti-corruption-grant mafia exerted during the consideration of this case, credit is due to the judge for the courage to write a dissenting opinion.
At the same time, another thing is also obvious.
Mazur analyzed only one aspect of the violations — in terms of the Criminal Procedure Code, probably because he comes from criminal justice.
Are judges — economic and civil judges who sit on the grand chamber of the Supreme Court — capable of any qualitative analysis of administrative violations by the High Council of Justice or violations of the Criminal Procedure Code?
Clearly not. This “hybrid” model of pseudo-justice called the Grand Chamber has long outlived its usefulness.