Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
The High Anti-Corruption Court (HACC) obliged the acting Prosecutor General to open a case regarding a possible crime by Arahamia. The notorious HACC judge Markiyan Halabala granted the complaint of the NGO “Center for Countering Corruption” about the prosecutor’s inaction.
https://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2026/11/05/8061319/
🐏Halabala is known for suing the mother of his own child and claiming that child support of 1 UAH is sufficient for raising his child, and he was also brought before a court for illegal crossing of the state border.
https://t.me/officeofjudicalcleansing/138
‼️This HACC decision is anomalous for the court, since HACC usually denies 99% of similar complaints.
🧻One provision of the Criminal Procedure Code is formulated such that all courts in the country grant 99% of similar complaints, and only HACC does the opposite — refusing in 99% of cases, which is supported in the HACC Presidential Administration (earlier we wrote about the official statistics).
✅A telling example is the complaint from the same NGO “Center for Countering Corruption” with outgoing no. 25_0224_51_CCC dated 24.02.2025 regarding failure to enter into the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations information about the fact of the likely commission by the chair of the Kyiv Court of Appeal, Yaroslav Holovachov, of criminal offenses provided for in part 3, art. 209 and part 1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.”
📺Some of the assets enrichment of the head of the Kyiv Court of Appeal were shown in the Hromadske.ua report “Free of charge, with love: how the family of the court chair accumulated three million dollars’ worth of assets.”
https://hromadske.ua/polityka/239912-bezoplatno-z-liuboviu-iak-rodyna-holovy-sudu-nazbyrala-mayna-na-try-milyony-dolariv
In reality there are even more assets, since several apartments of the “court master” are even registered to the child’s nanny.
🤡At that time, the clown judge of HACC Vitaliy Dubas, in a ruling dated 18.03.2025, refused to oblige entry of information into the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations and to start a pre-trial investigation regarding Y. Holovachov https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/126045364
✍️The investigative judge writes: “all information about the numerous assets of the judge and his relatives worth several million US dollars is based exclusively on assumptions and circumstantial data, and not on the basis of authentic legal documents that certify legal facts of ownership with a reliable value of the property.”
🤷At that time the CCC did not raise an outcry or broadcast the hearing, because according to our data Yaroslav Holovachov had long become an agent and helped expose judges who drink coffee.
https://advokatpost.com/istoriia-pro-kavu-koniak-dva-litaka-35-tysiach-dolariv-ta-trokh-suddiv-kyivskoho-apeliatsijnoho-sudu/
‼️A striking confirmation of Holovachov’s cooperation is his absence from the CCC “special project” page “By whose hands are NABU and SAP being destroyed?” https://nabudestroyers.antac.org.ua/.
⚖️The activists singled out three judges of the Pechersky District Court as the culprits (even forgetting Misha Yushkov, who sent the NABU detective to the pretrial detention center), but they do not mention any judge of the appellate court.
✅It is precisely the “court master” Holovachov who is involved in all appellate decisions on the arbitrary detention of NABU detectives, but everyone forgot about that…
We wrote about this in August 2025 👉 https://t.me/officeofjudicalcleansing/585
❗️OFFICE OF PURIFICATION ⚖️ SEND NEWS
🚀 Read more on our FaceBook…
Telegram publication
