Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
☑️🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡
🚫 Forrest Gump without Vesely. An investigative mistake or a checklist?
In every major case there's a list of those who were searched today. And there's a second list — those who were not searched today. Everyone reads the first. The second is read by those who understand how investigations are set up.
Let's break down today's NABU list in the Sense Bank / “Forrest Gump” case:
🔸Oksana Mudra, deputy head of the Office of the President. Her name appears on Minidch's tapes in the context of personnel appointments to state banks and Karpatnaftokhim.
🔸Vadym Stolar, Member of Parliament. Appears in the financial circuit of Sense Bank.
🔸Maksym Mykytas, former MP, developer. The main witness. The one who has Mudra's recordings.
🔸Mykola Hladyshchenko, removed chairman of the supervisory board of Sense Bank
🔸Oleksiy Stupak, chairman of the supervisory board of Sense Bank. The official who was appointed after the Cabinet decision of 12 February 2024 — the same decision whose composition Vesely named 40 days earlier.
☑️ The sixth name that is missing from this list. Vasyl Vesely. Former adviser to the supervisory board of that same Sense Bank. The person whose voice on Minidch's tapes 40 days before the Cabinet meeting names six surnames for the supervisory board — and 12 February 2024 the Cabinet approves exactly those six surnames. Not five. Not seven. Six. Those exact ones.
If this is an operation against Minidch's circuit in Sense Bank — Vesely is central to it. Not secondary, not a witness — central. Because it is he who names the composition on the tapes. It is he who appears as the 'overseer' from the Office of the President in the materials of Yaroslav Zheleznyak, Ukrainska Pravda and TSN. He was already detained by the SBU.
And yet 19 August he is not on the list. The explanation 'the investigators didn't have time' is immediately ruled out. Vesely's name appears in the case materials since June. The explanation 'Vesely is outside the jurisdiction' also doesn't work. Stolar is currently in Monaco — they still conducted a search in absentia, charged him, and a court set a preventive measure. Jurisdiction isn't an obstacle when there is procedural will.
Two options remain.
🔸An investigative mistake. In the most high-profile case of the year NABU forgot the person whose voice underpins the supervisory board episode. This isn't a mistake. It's official negligence, for which heads of investigative groups resign. No one at NABU has resigned.
🔸A checklist. Vesely is absent from the 19 August list not because he was 'forgotten,' but because he couldn't be there. Because the person whose materials this investigation was gathering cannot simultaneously be an object of that same investigation. This is a standard construction. In international practice such people are called cooperating witnesses. In Ukrainian — a procedural witness under an agreement.
We are not saying Vesely is an agent. We are saying: the list of 19 August without Vesely is possible only under one construction. And that construction has a specific procedural name.
And now the main question that anyone who met Vesely in Monaco over the past month, dined with him at Café de Paris, sailed on his yacht, shared plans about Ukrainian assets must ask themselves: which of those conversations are already in NABU's case materials? We know who was in Monaco over the past month. We know the routes. We know the tables.
💬 ABleaks_bot
💕 Join
