Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
Lies as a Ticket to the Supreme Court: How the Secretary of the Grand Chamber Deceived the HQCJ
Recently we reported on the abnormal speed with which then-judge of the Prymorskyi Court of Odesa, now Secretary of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court Serhiy Pohrybnyi (Yahupop) decided the fate of the pavilion for humanoid apes at the Kyiv Zoo.
https://t.me/officeofjudicalcleansing/1223
Here is the timeline of case No.522/15678/13-a:
🔗19.06.2013 — the lawsuit was filed with the court;
🔗24.06.2013 — an order was issued to open proceedings;
🔗27.06.2013 — a ruling was issued.
☝️During the interview for the Supreme Court the judge explained such frantic haste by saying he was "going on vacation and did not want to leave unresolved cases." Evidence is on video.
However, data from the Unified State Register of Court Decisions prove: this is cynical lying.
‼️Evidence of deception by Judge Pohrybnyi
1. No vacation In July–August 2013 the judge did not take any ‼️ vacation. Analysis of the USRCD shows that he worked actively throughout July and August and issued dozens of procedural documents weekly: 01-05.07 the judge issued 25 procedural documents, 8-12.07 - 22 documents, 22-26.07 - 34 documents, 29.07-02.08 - 23 documents, 5-09.08 - 68 documents, 12-16.08 - 26 documents, 19-23.08 - 5 documents. The only four-day vacation was only at the end of the summer: from 26 to 30 August 2013.
2. Other cases that arrived at the same time were scheduled …. several months later.
3. A cosmic blunder with document registration is the cherry on the cake: the judge signed with the CEP and sent to the registry the order to open proceedings AFTER signing the full text of the ruling — 05.08.2013.
📌The order to open proceedings dated 24.06.2013 (https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/32786774)
📌The ruling dated 27.06.2013 (https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/32786770)
4. The registry serial number of the order is larger than the number of the ruling, and the receipt date of both documents is 05.08.2013 (a month after the hearing). This indicates that the documents were sent simultaneously (first the ruling, then the order, several seconds later).
5. A logical question arises: how did representatives of the Kyiv Zoo even manage to learn about the proceeding if the judge notified them a month after the hearing? The answer is obvious — a gang: everyone was fully "in the know and in on" the scheme.
The position of the members of the HQCJ is quite telling:
🐏 The rapporteur, the “scholar” Vasylenko, was obviously interested in promoting the candidate and openly distracted attention from this arbitrariness.
🫏 The HRC representative Mykhailo Zhernakov also ignored these public and glaring facts, although he was obliged to verify and disclose them.
Conclusion: Serhiy Pohrybnyi passed the competitive selection by deception and took a seat on the Supreme Court.
The judges of the Grand Chamber chose a liar as their leader - the Secretary of the chamber.
📌 What to do?
We call on every concerned citizen and lawyer to file an official disciplinary complaint with the High Council of Justice. People who openly lie in interviews during competitions have no right to administer justice at the highest instance of the country!
‼️We call on Serhiy Oleksiyovych “Yahupop” to resign from the bench and avoid further disgrace. Your lie has been exposed and undermines the authority of the Supreme Court.
❗️CLEANING OFFICE ⚖️ SEND NEWS
🚀 Read more on our FaceBook…
