Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
“Strangers don't walk here,” or Why do NABU and SAP register complaints from the “chosen”?
29.10.2025 NABU and SAP received complaints from an individual and the NGO "NON-STOP Ukraine" about a criminal offense involving the seizure of LLC "Philosophy of Development."
Since the information was not entered into the Unified Register of Pretrial Investigations, the complainants appealed to the High Anti-Corruption Court.
🎬 The content of the complaints almost duplicates the movie of operation “Themis” regarding the raider seizure of LLC "Philosophy of Development" with the same figures…
❌ However, by rulings of the High Anti-Corruption Court dated 11.11.2025 and 17.11.2025, the complaints about the inaction of the authorized person of SAP/NABU—consisting in the failure to enter information into the Unified Register of Pretrial Investigations after receiving a report of criminal offenses—were denied.
🔗 The court decisions can be read at the links:
https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/131931208
https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/131711167
💭 This once again confirms the unwillingness to have complainants in criminal proceedings — apparently, to avoid leaks of information.
🤷♂️ Maybe it’s worth amending the Criminal Procedure Code so that NABU/SAP register proceedings only on their own initiative or based on complaints from selected complainants?!
❗️OFFICE OF PURIFICATION ⚖️ SEND NEWS
🚀 Read more on our FaceBook…
