Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
⚖️👨⚖️82 days of waiting — and a conclusion on the day of NABU searches: The High Council of Justice closed the disciplinary track regarding two judges from the “Femida” story
📂⚡️ The First Disciplinary Chamber of the High Council of Justice refused to open a case against Pechersky District Court judge Oleh Bilotserkivets and Kyiv Court of Appeal judge Ivan Rybak. It was Bilotserkivets who on 27 October 2025 placed a seizure on the corporate rights of Filosofiya Development with a prohibition on registration actions — according to the SAP prosecutor’s version, this allowed the figures in the “Femida” case to effectively secure control over the seized company. Rybak later reviewed the appeal of that seizure and ultimately left it in force.
🕸🏗 According to NABU and SAP, Filosofiya Development, which controlled valuable real estate of the former Arsenal factory in central Kyiv, was first illegally re-registered via a hacked state registrar account and straw persons. It was the seizure of corporate rights that became one of the legal instruments preventing the company from being returned through ordinary registration actions. The complaint about the actions of Bilotserkivets and Rybak was assigned to High Council of Justice inspector Alina Kovalchuk back on 29 May, but she completed the conclusion rejecting it only on 19 August — the same day NABU began publishing the materials of the “Femida” case.
📜⏳Recall, Commercial Court of Kyiv judge Serhiy Stasiuk agreed for up to $10 thousand to suspend the director of LLC Filosofiya Development due to bankruptcy, and on 26 March 2026 issued exactly such an order.
Subscribe: Bankova Mail
Follow us on X
Top on the site
