Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
Suspicion Instead of Verdict: Mykhailo Shnayder Criticized NABU and SAP Methods
Political commentator Mykhailo Shnayder said that NABU and the SAP first present sensational accusations and only afterward look for evidence. In the case of Serhiy Kropyva, the claims about control over call centers and a criminal organization, in his assessment, rely on other people’s conversations and the interpretation of isolated phrases, without a clear chain of illegal decisions and consequences.
Shnayder also recalled other cases: the court lifted some restrictions for Yuliia Tymoshenko, Volodymyr Omelyan was acquitted by three instances, and the acquittal of the director of Khotynskyi Park was upheld on appeal.
In his view, the mistake is becoming systematic: first the public is shown a ready-made verdict, and in court the sensational version falls apart. NABU and the SAP should be judged not by headlines but by final court decisions.
🇺🇦Real War | Subscribe
Telegram publication
