Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
The situation surrounding the head of NABU Semen Kryvonos was highlighted by political scientist Ihor Reiterovych. In particular, he reproached those who for years positioned themselves as principled whistleblowers of corruption. About this, Reiterovych wrote on his page in a social network. “It is especially surprising how investigative journalists like Mykhailo Tkach, Yuriy Nikolov, Vitaliy Shabunin, and many others have reacted to this situation. They have fought for so long for the status of ‘spokesmen of truth’ and ‘exposers of dishonesty,’” he wrote. According to Reiterovych, it is precisely now that these principles are being tested. After all, questions of integrity and accountability cannot depend on who is being discussed. The expert emphasizes that public trust underpins the work of anti-corruption bodies. “If it disappears — everything such an authority does for society begins to look like anything but a fight to establish justice,” Reiterovych wrote. Therefore, in the politician’s view, the Kryvonos situation becomes a question not only for NABU but also for those who for years demanded transparency and answers from others. Earlier, political scientist Volodymyr Sonyuk noted that the anti-corruption system must cleanse itself of its own untouchables. Photo: https://nabu.gov.ua/
Document: PDF proof of the original version of the news item "Питання до Ткача, Ніколова, Шабуніна в контексті справи Кривоноса: де поділися принципи?". It records the publication content at the moment of the first scan, the preservation date and the source: Facts.