Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
#думки_вголос 🧐
⁉️One gets a criminal case, another gets Paris?
This is turning into an interesting story…
Earlier the Office of the Prosecutor General sent an indictment to court against MP Oleksandr Dubinsky. The essence of the case: according to the investigation, he gave a false reason for traveling abroad — that he was accompanying his father for medical treatment — while the prosecutors’ evidence indicates he traveled for a different purpose. For this he is being charged with official forgery.
Now let’s look at the story with Ruslan Kravchenko.
Kravchenko arranged a business trip to Paris allegedly to participate in an event of the PACE Parliamentary Network on the situation of Ukrainian children. However, PACE stated that neither Kravchenko nor representatives of his agency will take part in that meeting. His speech is also not included in the published program.
And a very simple question arises…
If a person obtains the opportunity to leave Ukraine by stating one reason in the documents, while the actual circumstances turn out to be different — how is one case fundamentally different from the other?
Dubinsky is accused of official forgery for such a trip and the case is sent to court.
So what about Kravchenko? Who will check the documents on the basis of which he arranged the business trip and left Ukraine?
Because for now a very strange picture is emerging: one is put on trial, while the other, under no less dubious circumstances, simply goes to Paris.
So does something still depend on the surname and the position?
Telegram publication
