Back
Original version

Legalization of property worth 26 million UAH: former head of the Commercial Cassation Court Bohdan Lviv has been notifi...

Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.

Legalization of property worth 26 million UAH: former head of the Commercial Cassation Court Bohdan Lviv has been notified of suspicion.

The NABU and SAP have notified former head of the CC of the Supreme Court Bohdan Lviv of suspicion in legalizing (laundering) property obtained by criminal means, in an especially large amount.

In addition, two other persons have been notified of suspicion in committing the crime — the judge’s former subordinate and her mother.

During the period 2021–2022 years, the suspect acquired assets totaling about 26 million UAH.

These include a house with a plot of land, two apartment-flats, and four land plots.

According to NABU, in order to hide the illegal origin of the funds and the true owner of the assets, he involved his subordinate in the criminal scheme, who in fact performed the duties of his secretary.

The illegally acquired property was officially registered in her mother’s name, which made it possible to conceal traces of the crime and legalize the assets.

More details here.

Recall, Lviv was dismissed from the Supreme Court in the fall of 2022 after Scheme journalists found a Russian passport in his possession.

The presence of Russian citizenship was also confirmed by the SBU.

Lviv is still appealing the decision on his dismissal. The case has been under consideration in the Administrative Cases Division of the Supreme Court for more than two years.

Screenshot of a Telegram post: Legalization of property worth 26 million UAH: former head of the Commercial Ca…

Легалізація майна на 26 млн грн: повідомлено про підозру ексголові Касаційного господарського суду Богдану Львову.

НАБУ та САП повідомили про підозру колишньому голові КГС ВС Богдану Львову в легалізації (відмиванні) майна, одержаного злочинним шляхом, в особливо великому розмірі.

Крім того, про підозру у вчиненні злочину повідомлено ще двом особам — колишній підлеглій судді та її матері.

У період 2021–2022 років підозрюваний набув у власність активи на загальну суму близько 26 млн грн.

Йдеться про будинок із земельною ділянкою, дві квартири-апартаменти та чотири земельні ділянки.

За версією НАБУ, щоб приховати незаконне походження коштів та справжнього власника активів, він залучив до злочинної схеми свою підлеглу, яка фактично виконувала обов’язки його секретаря.

Незаконно набуте майно офіційно реєстрували на її матір, що дозволяло маскувати сліди злочину та легалізувати активи.

Докладніше тут.

Нагадаємо, Львова було звільнено з ВС восени 2022 року після того, як журналісти Схем знайшли у нього російський паспорт.

Наявність російського громадянства підтвердили і в СБУ.

Львов досі оскаржує рішення про його звільнення. Справа вже більше двох років розглядається в КАС ВС.

Screenshot of a Telegram post: Легалізація майна на 26 млн грн: повідомлено про підозру ексголові Касаційного…
Download Download proof

Other channel publications

Scanned Telegram publication

Today the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) and the Expert Council were deciding on candidates for the Specialized Administrative Court of Appeal. Reminder: 10 judicial vacancies have been identified in this court. To begin work, at least half need to be appointed. 23 candidates reached the stage of joint interviews. 21 candidates appeared for the interview itself. Before that, the Expert Council determined that 19 out of 23 were not of integrity. For the rest, the votes of the Exp...

Scanned Telegram publication

Last week, candidates for the district administrative courts and judges who expressed a desire to be transferred through the competition chose their future courts. Let's recall the numbers. The vacant positions in first-instance administrative courts for which the High Council of Justice conducted this competition were 272. 268 people applied to the High Council of Justice to participate in this competition. 263 people passed the admission stage. 242 people chose positions in the courts, 15 of w...

Scanned Telegram publication

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court issued an important decision regarding the qualification assessment of judges for fitness to hold their position. By this decision, the GC SC determined at which stage a judge may challenge the High Qualification Commission of Judges’ decision finding them unfit for their position. When the HQCJ adopts a negative decision based on a judge’s assessment as to fitness for their position, it submits a proposal to the High Council of Justice for the judge’s dism...

Scanned Telegram publication

The Office of the President published two decrees appointing judges. Earlier last week four more were published. It appears that judges are being appointed according to two criteria: 1. “Lost” decrees from 1-7 years are located, signed, and published. 2. New submissions from the HCJ are processed as quickly as possible, decrees are signed, and also published. This indicates a change in the Office of the President’s policy on judicial appointments after the Mudra-Mykitas recordings exposed storie...

Scanned Telegram publication

The Plenum of the Supreme Court, which last Friday attempted to decide on the necessity of holding a new competition for the SC, failed to reach a decisive vote on that issue. The votes of the Supreme Court judges split almost in half. Later it turned out that the counting commission also does not know how to add up in a column. Therefore the voting results were annulled, and the issue of announcing the competition will be considered at the next plenum. Recall that the SC already has more than 5...

Scanned Telegram publication

The President has appointed more 15 judges. The Office of the President released today Decrees dated 15 September 2026, numbers 911-914 and 920/2026–930/2026. Unlike the previous two rounds, when judges were appointed mostly to a single appellate court, yesterday’s appointments can be called a “mixed bag.” There are first-instance judges whose decrees had been “lost” for several years, appellate judges who received recommendations for appointment 3-6 months ago, and even a couple of judges whose...