This is precisely where the business line runs. Danylo Slipchuk, who, according to SAP, Kropyva brought into the IT depa...

This is precisely where the business line runs. Danylo Slipchuk, who, according to SAP, Kropyva brought into the IT department of the Office of the Prosecutor General and who appears in the case materials, was a co-owner of "Kvolitil." Among the company's owners is Illia Ruslanovych Havryliuk. That is also the name of Ruslan Havryliuk’s son, who headed the Dnipro unit of the cyber police in Vykhodets’ department. A very interesting coincidence.

https://www.slidstvo.info/articles/druzhyna-likarka-i-bezrobitna-mama-iaki-raptovo-pochaly-zarobliaty-milyony-do-choho-tut-shakhrayski-kol-tsentry-i-spetsoperatsiia-karfahen/

https://opendatabot.ua/c/45141232

https://public.nazk.gov.ua/documents/9b9f3c0f-c0a2-4b14-89dc-4c35920cb9ea

https://cyberpolice.gov.ua/news/kiberpolicziya-doluchylasya-do-stvorennya-novyx-osvitnix-prostoriv-u-dduvs-4228/

There is also the phrase from Kropyva to an acquaintance in the Odesa cyber police in the case materials: "Cyber, international, IT — it's all still ours."

I think NABU should take a much closer look at Mr. Vykhodets if the investigation is interested not in one or two heads of the hydra, but the whole hydra. I am convinced that Mr. Vykhodets could tell a lot about Kropyva, his former colleagues, and how the interaction between the prosecutor's office and the cyber police was organized.

https://suspilne.media/amp/1397602-akso-krasti-to-miljon-ak-topposadovec-ogp-kropiva-za-versieu-nabu-krisuvav-kol-centri-j-vidmivav-grosi/

I will remind you that in 2025 Bihus.Info published testimony about extortion from models and OnlyFans studios by the cyber police, raised the issue of "offices," and also investigated Vykhodets’ property and luxurious lifestyle.

https://bihus.info/mayetok-bilya-morya-lyuksova-tachka-ta-kolyshnya-druzhyna-shho-pryhovuye-golovnyj-kiberpoliczejskyj-krayiny/

I think there are already enough materials for a new season of the series "Cyber Police." And it could be much more interesting.

https://bihus.info/tag/kiberpolicziya/

And finally, I'll return to the beginning. The question with the head of "Non-Stop," Yakovets, is clear. According to blogger Ivanov, his activities increasingly resemble the trajectory of Anatoly Shariy. According to unverified information, simultaneously with Mr. Shariy’s case, Spanish law enforcement, in cooperation with the Germans, are also investigating his case. But, again, I cannot verify this information.

The version regarding Yurii Vykhodets’ involvement in providing forceful cover for the "Non-Stop" project, if confirmed, could prove quite toxic for him and the entire cyber police. The first obvious question is why would the cyber police pressure "Madyar," who in no way is involved in the situation? To be frank, I would find that incomprehensible.

I raise this question because I am convinced that a forceful protection exists for Mr. Yakovets’ project. It is a guarantee of 1000%, and it is based on the laws of the kompromat business. Without agreement with a patron, Yakovets would not systematically threaten a person of the level, authority, and influence of "Madyar." So it is likely coordinated with a curator. But why? And here, if the rumors turned out to be true, any versions would be possible. For example, NABU shut down call centers, and now there is a desire to "shake" the military? Or is it an attempt to negotiate with "Madyar" so that he would stop Ivanov with his media campaign against "Non-Stop"? Offer your own options.

National Police of Ukraine NABU Office of the Prosecutor General