Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
The Volyn tax authority reassessed more than 380 000 UAH to a woman for income of 50 000 dollars from OnlyFans
🗂️ The Volyn District Administrative Court dismissed the lawsuit of Oksana Zhogol, who tried to cancel tax notices-decisions regarding undeclared income from creating content on the OnlyFans platform.
💷 According to the case materials, tax officials conducted an unscheduled documentary audit after receiving information from competent authorities in the United Kingdom. The British side reported that in 2023 the Ukrainian model received 51 510 US dollars from the company Fenix International Ltd for creating content on OnlyFans. The audit established that the woman did not file a tax declaration for 2023 and also did not pay personal income tax and the military levy.
⚖️ In court the plaintiff denied receiving such income and stated that the tax authority did not provide primary documents or proof of registration on the platform. However, the court concluded that the information obtained through international exchange of tax data from the United Kingdom is a proper source of tax information. At the same time, bank statements from Ukrainian banks provided by the plaintiff do not refute receiving funds via electronic wallets, and she did not provide a statement from the e‑Wallet.
🚫 The court found the reassessment of taxes and fines for untaxed foreign income lawful. The Volyn District Administrative Court fully dismissed the lawsuit.
💡 Advice from “Sudom po skhemakh”:
• Declare foreign income on time: the tax authority receives data about receipts on international platforms and electronic wallets through mechanisms of international information exchange.
• Keep complete primary documentation and statements not only from Ukrainian banks but also from all payment systems and e‑wallets you use, because it will be up to you to prove the absence of income in court.
🔗 This was reported by the Telegram channel “Sudom po skhemakh” with reference to the decision of 14 October 2026 in case No. 140/7900/26.
Telegram publication
