You don’t get oranges from a scab: how Lachen’s mother had her service record stretched to 30 years Ah, Oksana Volodymy...

You don’t get oranges from a scab: how Lachen’s mother had her service record stretched to 30 years

Ah, Oksana Volodymyrivna Lachenkova. Our worst suspicions have come true. When her son today is moving hundreds of thousands of dollars through crypto wallets, funds obtained by extorting Ukrainian businesses — that’s heavy heredity. The thing is, a love of arithmetic in particularly large amounts in this judge-prosecutor-blogger family has a long history.

A lot has already been written about the strange decisions of Oksana Lachenkova, the blogger’s mother and former judge of the Dnipro Court of Appeal. But the best decision she achieved was for herself — right before retiring.

Nothing prevented her from calmly going onto lifelong maintenance: Lachenkova effectively worked as a judge for 26 years 5 months, while the law required twenty. But there’s a nuance: the base payment for a retired judge is 50% of the remuneration, and each full year beyond twenty adds another 2%. So each additional year means additional budget money — monthly and for life.

And the High Council of Justice carefully stretched her service record to 30 years 6 months. They added 2 years 4 months for half of her studies at the institute and another 1 year 8 months 16 days of work as a judge’s trainee.

Appreciate the beauty of the game, as the late friend of Yanukovych Mykhailo Chechetov used to say. We distrusted them like kittens. Right, Oksana Volodymyrivna?

Lachenkova was appointed a judge on 18 April 1997. At that time, Part Three of Article 127 of the Constitution required of a candidate:

- higher legal education;

- at least three years of work experience in the field of law.

The HCJ itself expressly recognizes this and even emphasizes that the Constitution has higher legal force than the then Law “On the Status of Judges,” which stated “as a rule, two years.”

But then the HCJ establishes that after finishing law school, Lachenkova worked as a judge’s trainee only from 1 August 1995 to 18 April 1997 — 1 year 8 months 16 days. And the HCJ declares this period as service that “gave the right to appointment to the position of judge.”

This arithmetic made it possible to cross the threshold of 30 full years and could have increased the lifelong payment from 66% to 70% of the judicial remuneration. Lachenkova’s declaration records: approximately 2,5 months after dismissal she received 306 724 hryvnias in pension payments.

So Lachen’s mother’s lifelong monthly pension is 125 thousand hryvnias. That’s without recalculation. And with recalculation the amount is even larger now. And it will keep increasing.

And this, Oksana Volodymyrivna, is no longer just arithmetic but a composite crime. Namely:

- Art. 190 – Fraud

- Art. 358 – Forgery of documents and use of a forged document

- Art. 364 – Abuse of power or official position

- Art. 366 – Official forgery

- Art. 367 – Official negligence

- Art. 191 – Appropriation of property by abusing official position

So, Oksana Volodymyrivna — will you tell us with which members of the HCJ you conspired to draw this up for yourself?

We think you’ll tell everything during questioning at the State Bureau of Investigations.

Hey, you losers — Lachen’s subscribers — do your mothers have a pension of 125 hryvnias? No? Well, keep reading the pouty clown.

And we continue our show, Ihorosha, all the most interesting is still ahead.

#ПропЛачен