Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
Everyone has long been intensely concerned with who this blogger Volodymyr Bondarenko really is, in particular who is behind his latest incarnation. After all, it’s obvious that the content before Bondarenko’s “disappearance” in November last year and after that is created by different authors.
Audience interest is heightened by posts attacking Oleh Tatarov. For example, today’s post about Tatarov and Stolar. When “Bondarenko” throws mud at Fedorov—well, that’s just the basic pro-government mainstream. But when they go after Tatarov, who after every piece against him launches a search-and-repressive apparatus—that’s already interesting.
And that’s precisely why, they say, the well-known veteran of the media front Vova Petrov nearly went gray overnight when rumors circulated through the market that he was behind the Bondarenko account. And to deflect these terrible suspicions from himself, immediately after another Bondarenko post about OT, he even launched a whole special operation: he had his employee Hryshyn publish a post claiming that the Bondarenko account was supposedly run by an even more ancient hero of Ukrainian media—Stanislav Rechynskyi—which caused a heart attack and diarrhea in that very Rechynskyi, who rushed into the comments to deny it. It all resembles a game in which elderly people toss a burning turd from hand to hand. Whoever is last—Oleh Yuriyovych Tatarov will come for them. Vova Petrov, please don’t worry: no one seriously suspected you. And not because the content is good, but simply because—there’s no carrot, chicken feet, or other standard props.
But the market, and with it Oleh Yuriyovych Tatarov, continue to wonder: so who really is Volodymyr Bondarenko?
And so we ask the admin of the “Volodymyr Bondarenko” account, who reads us attentively (and we know it), to dispel our vague suspicions and do a thorough investigation of Seyar Kurshutov (especially since he is a senior colleague, partner, and mentor of Lachen, whose activities inspired us to write this post). By some absurd coincidence, Kurshutov is not mentioned at all on the Bondarenko Facebook account, while on Telegram there are three episodic mentions about nothing, left by the old admin—which, given Seyar Osmanovych’s influence on processes, raises questions. Especially if you take into account that the account relentlessly attacks Seyar Osmanovych’s enemy—the aforementioned Mykhailo Fedorov.
In short, we ask “Bondarenko” to prove to the world that he is not Seyar Osmanovych Bondarenko. Thanks in advance. And after the investigation we recommend taking a little rest: 5 September at La Scala the premiere of L’elisir d’amore. And there’s a very thematic exhibition there right now—La Scala rinasce, “La Scala is reborn.” In Milan this season people are thinking a lot about disappearances, returns, and new versions of old characters.
#ПропЛачен
