In order for the members of the Ethics Council to have a more substantive conversation with Kucherenko, we have prepared...

In order for the members of the Ethics Council to have a more substantive conversation with Kucherenko, we have prepared a number of questions for them, the answers to which the public wants to hear:

Protocols on corruption were drawn up against Mr. Kucherenko, which were closed under non-rehabilitating circumstances. How and in what manner were the corruption protocols closed, and in which court? Does Mr. Kucherenko not find it strange that the son of the head of that court worked in his department of financial law when he was the head of that department?

By what integrity criteria did Kucherenko choose a person with a criminal past for the position of head of the NABU, and who, in order to somehow correct this, fictitiously adopted a child?!

The public is also interested — is Mr. Kucherenko aware of the circumstances under which Misha Z. Zhernakov, during martial law, suddenly became a professor at a university department that is part of the structure of the university where Kucherenko himself works, all in order to evade mobilization?!

Let Mr. Kucherenko comment on how he acquired the status of Honorary Professor of the law university, in particular, what is his workload? The status gives him a lifelong right to work, and no one can fire him. And this was done within 1 day after his appointment as deputy minister. The point is that almost everything is decided by other people. How does this align with integrity criteria?!

Also, of course, it is necessary to ask — is Kucherenko aware of the circumstances of Zhernakov's transfer to the District Administrative Court of the City of Kyiv? Is he aware that Zhernakov came to introductions with Pavlo Vovk because he was planning to transfer to the OASK without a competition? And in general, how does he assess the activities of his faggot-ass stepson?

One could also ask Kucherenko why, being a millionaire, he did not pay for utilities in the amount of over 100 thousand?

And Zhernakov can take familiar embassy representatives (probably exactly the same idiots as himself) and come to this interview. In order to ensure the rule of law as the main element of the "Fundamentals" European integration cluster, without any pressure 😂

If these questions are not asked, it will mean that all these interviews are yet another fake, for the purpose of pushing through "their own candidates," which we all knew anyway.

https://t.me/PodMantiyey/7211

In order for the members of the Ethics Council to have a more substantive conversation with Kucherenko, we have prepared a number of questions for them, the answers to which the public wants to hear:

Protocols on corruption were drawn up against Mr.

Kucherenko, which were closed under non-rehabilitating circumstances.

How and in what manner were the corruption protocols closed, and in which court?

Does Mr.

Kucherenko not find it strange that the son of the head of that court worked in his department of financial law when he was the head of that department?

By what integrity criteria did Kucherenko choose a person with a criminal past for the position of head of the NABU, and who, in order to somehow correct this, fictitiously adopted a child?!

The public is also interested — is Mr.

Kucherenko aware of the circumstances under which Misha Z.

Zhernakov, during martial law, suddenly became a professor at a university department that is part of the structure of the university where Kucherenko himself works, all in order to evade mobilization?!

Let Mr.

Kucherenko comment on how he acquired the status of Honorary Professor of the law university, in particular, what is his workload?

The status gives him a lifelong right to work, and no one can fire him.

And this was done within 1 day after his appointment as deputy minister.

The point is that almost everything is decided by other people.

How does this align with integrity criteria?!

Also, of course, it is necessary to ask — is Kucherenko aware of the circumstances of Zhernakov's transfer to the District Administrative Court of the City of Kyiv?

Is he aware that Zhernakov came to introductions with Pavlo Vovk because he was planning to transfer to the OASK without a competition?

And in general, how does he assess the activities of his faggot-ass stepson?

One could also ask Kucherenko why, being a millionaire, he did not pay for utilities in the amount of over 100 thousand?

And Zhernakov can take familiar embassy representatives (probably exactly the same idiots as himself) and come to this interview.

In order to ensure the rule of law as the main element of the "Fundamentals" European integration cluster, without any pressure 😂

If these questions are not asked, it will mean that all these interviews are yet another fake, for the purpose of pushing through "their own candidates," which we all knew anyway.

P.S.

We remembered something else.

It can be asked whether Academician Kucheryavenko whether he is familiar with the provisions of the Law "On Prevention of Corruption" regarding restrictions on receiving anything free of charge from third persons?

And how, in this context, would he comment on his free accommodation in Oksana Syroid's apartment?

https://t.me/PodMantiyey/7211