Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
Today the Expert Council that evaluates candidates for the Specialized District Administrative Court and the Specialized Administrative Appeals Court reviewed another 16 candidates for judgeships at these courts.
All the candidates were deemed untrustworthy, and therefore their candidacies must be reviewed at joint sessions of the High Qualification Commission of Judges and the Ethics Council.
Recall that last week the Expert Council reviewed another 22 candidates, of whom 19 were found untrustworthy, and 3 were not very trustworthy.
So currently none of the 38 candidates qualifies as trustworthy.
In principle, both competitions can be halted at this stage. And, evidently, the rules need to be rewritten.
Because when everyone is bad, the problem is clearly not the candidates.
Telegram publication
