Back
Original version

Since our channel began operating, we have pointed out dozens of times the brutal delay in the President signing decrees...

Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.

Since our channel began operating, we have pointed out dozens of times the brutal delay in the President signing decrees on the appointment of judges.

Each time we named names.

First Smyrnov, then Mudra and Dubovyk.

In other words, we publicly drew the attention of those personally responsible for this situation.

We now have a proposal.

In addition to the usual political statements, the HCMC can take one more simple step to encourage the staff of the Office of the President to review the HCMC’s personnel submissions more quickly.

In our view, a sufficiently simple solution would be to introduce a public table that would display the following information:

1) date materials regarding the candidate/judge were received from the NJAC;

2) date the recommendation regarding the candidate/judge was considered by the HCMC;

3) date the HCMC’s submission was sent to the President;

4) date the appointment decree was issued;

5) date the judge took the Oath.

Updates to such a table could be made weekly, following the example of the judge position accounting table maintained by the NJAC.

By the way, a public table accounting for judge positions did not always exist either.

At the time Zhernakov participated in the selection procedure, the list of vacancies was classified.

And it could only be reviewed by the method known at that time.

Now it is time to make public the information on judicial appointments broken down by specific dates and names.

And if, again, any of the candidates/judges ends up in the wrong “bucket,” the whole country and our international partners will see it.

Screenshot of a Telegram post: Since our channel began operating, we have pointed out dozens of times the brut…

Наш канал з моменту початку своєї роботи десятки разів звертав увагу на брутальне затягування підписання Президентом указів про призначення суддів.

Кожен раз ми називали прізвища.

Спочатку Смирнова, а потім Мудрої і Дубовика.

Тобто публічно звертали увагу тих, хто персонально відповідав за таку ситуацію.

Зараз маємо пропозицію.

Окрім звичайних заяв політичного характеру, ВРП може зробити ще один простий крок, щоб спонукати працівників Офісу Президента швидше розглядати кадрові подання ВРП.

На наше переконання, достатньо простим рішенням може бути запровадження публічної таблиці, в якій відображатиметься наступна інформація:

1) дата надходження матеріалів щодо кандидата/судді від ВККС;

2) дата розгляду рекомендації щодо кандидата/судді у ВРП;

3) дата відправки подання ВРП Президенту;

4) дата видання Указу про призначення;

5) дата прийняття суддею Присяги.

Оновлення такої таблиці може відбуватися щотижня за прикладом таблиці обліку посад суддів, яка ведеться у ВККС.

Між іншим, публічна таблиця обліку посад суддів теж не завжди існувала.

В часи, коли Жернаков брав участь у процедурі добору, список вакансій був утаємничений.

І ознайомитися з ним можна було лише відомим на той час способом.

Тепер прийшов час зробити публічною і інформацію щодо призначення суддів в розрізі конкретних дат і прізвищ.

І, якщо знову хтось з кандидатів/суддів потрапить не в той «кошик», це бачитиме вся країна та наші міжнародні партнери.

Screenshot of a Telegram post: Наш канал з моменту початку своєї роботи десятки разів звертав увагу на бруталь…
Download Download proof

Other channel publications

Scanned Telegram publication

This week the High Council of Justice dismissed five judges: - Two — retired; - Two — resigned at their own request; - One — in connection with being subject to disciplinary liability. At that, one of the judges who resigned at her own request had served in the position for less than two years. The other — only six. The judge dismissed for drinking on the job, Oksana Zvyagina, worked for a little more than 2 years. At the same time, since February 2026 she had been suspended from administering j...

Scanned Telegram publication

Today the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) and the Expert Council were deciding on candidates for the Specialized Administrative Court of Appeal. Reminder: 10 judicial vacancies have been identified in this court. To begin work, at least half need to be appointed. 23 candidates reached the stage of joint interviews. 21 candidates appeared for the interview itself. Before that, the Expert Council determined that 19 out of 23 were not of integrity. For the rest, the votes of the Exp...

Scanned Telegram publication

Legalization of property worth 26 million UAH: former head of the Commercial Cassation Court Bohdan Lviv has been notified of suspicion. The NABU and SAP have notified former head of the CC of the Supreme Court Bohdan Lviv of suspicion in legalizing (laundering) property obtained by criminal means, in an especially large amount. In addition, two other persons have been notified of suspicion in committing the crime — the judge’s former subordinate and her mother. During the period 2021–2022 years...

Scanned Telegram publication

Last week, candidates for the district administrative courts and judges who expressed a desire to be transferred through the competition chose their future courts. Let's recall the numbers. The vacant positions in first-instance administrative courts for which the High Council of Justice conducted this competition were 272. 268 people applied to the High Council of Justice to participate in this competition. 263 people passed the admission stage. 242 people chose positions in the courts, 15 of w...

Scanned Telegram publication

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court issued an important decision regarding the qualification assessment of judges for fitness to hold their position. By this decision, the GC SC determined at which stage a judge may challenge the High Qualification Commission of Judges’ decision finding them unfit for their position. When the HQCJ adopts a negative decision based on a judge’s assessment as to fitness for their position, it submits a proposal to the High Council of Justice for the judge’s dism...

Scanned Telegram publication

The Office of the President published two decrees appointing judges. Earlier last week four more were published. It appears that judges are being appointed according to two criteria: 1. “Lost” decrees from 1-7 years are located, signed, and published. 2. New submissions from the HCJ are processed as quickly as possible, decrees are signed, and also published. This indicates a change in the Office of the President’s policy on judicial appointments after the Mudra-Mykitas recordings exposed storie...