Back
Original version

The appeal court has begun hearing the case of former judge Petryk, in which the statutes of limitations expire already...

Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.

The appeal court has begun hearing the case of former judge Petryk, in which the statutes of limitations expire already on 1 December

The Appeals Chamber of the High Anti-Corruption Court has begun reviewing the verdict concerning former judge of the Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeal Ihor Petryk.

In July the HACC found him guilty of receiving a bribe of 5 thousand dollars for a favorable court decision and sentenced him to 7 years of imprisonment.

The appeal is being heard by judges Andrii Nykyforov, Oleh Pavlyshyn, and Danyila Chornenko.

The verdict was handed down back on 9 July. The defense filed an appeal on 14 August, but did not add copies of the complaint for the other parties to the proceedings. The court gave him an additional 15 days to remedy the defects, which he corrected only two weeks later.

Given that the period for bringing Petryk to liability expires on 1 December, such actions by the defense appear to be an attempt to delay the proceedings and buy time.

At the beginning of September the court scheduled the case for hearing, but the first session was then set only for today, 13 October.

During nearly three hours the panel did not move on to hear the appeals on the merits due to motions for re-examination of evidence and other submissions by the parties.

At the same time, the court refused to relax Petryk’s preventive measure — he will remain in custody.

❗️Less than two months remain until the statute of limitations expires. So now the main question is whether the appeal will manage to put an end to the case by 1 December.

The hearing will continue tomorrow, 14 October, at 9:00.

Subscribe

Screenshot of a Telegram post: The appeal court has begun hearing the case of former judge Petryk, in which th…

​​Апеляція почала розгляд справи екссудді Петрика, у якій строки спливають вже 1 грудня

Апеляційна палата ВАКС почала перегляд вироку щодо колишнього судді Київського апеляційного адміністративного суду Ігоря Петрика.

У липні ВАКС визнав його винним в одержанні 5 тисяч доларів хабаря за потрібне судове рішення та засудив до 7 років позбавлення волі.

Апеляцію розглядають судді Андрій Никифоров, Олег Павлишин та Даниїла Чорненька.

Вирок ухвалили ще 9 липня. Захисник подав апеляцію 14 серпня, але не додав копій скарги для інших учасників процесу. Суд дав йому ще 15 днів на усунення недоліків, які він виправив лише через два тижні.

З огляду на те, що строк притягнення Петрика до відповідальності спливає 1 грудня, такі дії захисту виглядають як спроба затягнути розгляд і виграти час.

На початку вересня суд призначив справу до розгляду, однак перше засідання тоді призначили лише на сьогодні, 13 жовтня.

За майже три години колегія так і не перейшла до розгляду апеляцій по суті через клопотання про повторне дослідження доказів та інші заяви сторін.

Водночас суд відмовився пом’якшувати Петрику запобіжний захід - він і надалі перебуватиме під вартою.

❗️До спливу строків  давності залишається менше двох місяців. Тож тепер головне питання - чи встигне апеляція поставити крапку у справі до 1 грудня. 

Розгляд продовжиться завтра, 14 жовтня, о 9:00.

Підписатися

Screenshot of a Telegram post: ​​Апеляція почала розгляд справи екссудді Петрика, у якій строки спливають вже…
Download Download proof

Other channel publications

Scanned Telegram publication

The Kuzminykh Case: The High Anti-Corruption Court Finished Questioning the Deputy, Who Remains Under Around-the-Clock House Arrest Today, 14 October, the High Anti-Corruption Court completed the questioning of Servant of the People MP Serhiy Kuzminykh, which lasted for more than 5 consecutive court sessions. Almost from the start of the questioning, Kuzminykh refused to answer the prosecutor’s questions, so throughout the questioning the MP gave voluntary testimony and responded to repetitive a...

Scanned Telegram publication

A former official who was accused of organizing titushky against Euromaidan has turned up among the owners of a sanctioned gas business This concerns Viktor Naumenko — a former deputy chairman of the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Council, who was once accused of aiding titushky who attacked Maidan activists and journalists. As journalist Alina Stryzhak found, Naumenko is one of the owners of the Cypriot company 3P International Energy LTD. Through that company he is linked to TOV Tysagaz, which holds...

Scanned Telegram publication

230 million UAH was received into the state budget with the assistance of NABU, SAP, and the SDFU💵 Thanks to the joint actions of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau, the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office, and the central office of the State Property Fund, 230 million UAH has been returned to the budget of Ukraine. During the investigation of one of the cases, detectives and prosecutors discovered facts of inaction by the leadership of one of the regional branches of the State Pro...

Scanned Telegram publication

The case of SBU General Vityuk: The Appeals Chamber left the case at VAKS The Appeals Chamber of VAKS considered a motion from the defense of the former head of the SBU Cyber Defense Department, Illia Vityuk, to change the court with jurisdiction over the case. ❗️The court decided to leave the case at VAKS. The defense attorney asked to transfer the case to the Solomianskyi District Court of Kyiv, arguing that Vityuk allegedly did not belong to the category of defendants under VAKS jurisdiction...

Scanned Telegram publication

🗣On whose testimony did the Austrian law enforcement officers rely when they detained journalists from "Ukrainska Pravda" in Vienna? Mykhailo Tkach, in a conversation with UP editor-in-chief Sevhil Musayeva, talks about new details of the detention and questions that remain unanswered. ▫️Why does he suggest a possible connection between the witnesses and Ruslan Kravchenko’s circle? ▫️Could there have been political influence on the actions of the Austrian law enforcement officers? Also about the...