Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
Conflict of interest? No, never heard of it 🤦♂️💼
Anti-corruption activists at the Center for Combating Corruption (CCP) are rejoicing: Shevchenkivskyi District Court judge in Kyiv Yuliya Matviieva rejected the SBU’s motion.
https://t.me/fuckcorruption/6774
The security forces wanted full access to the case management system of the High Anti-Corruption Court (HACC). At first glance — a victory for justice. But if you dig deeper, the situation looks extremely cynical.
🪝 Judge “on the hook” of NABU
Judge Yuliya Matviieva herself is solidly documented by NABU.
📌She appears in the high-profile case of former Supreme Court head Vsevolod Knyazev.
📌On covert surveillance recordings, Matviieva is allegedly heard discussing the division of a bribe with accomplices.
📌The price tag — $50 thousand for lifting the seizure on a Russian hotel.
📌The High Council of Justice opened a disciplinary case, but later suspended it.
📌The reason is banal: NABU simply did not provide the Council with the necessary materials.
https://t.me/officeofjudicalcleansing/1166
As a result, Judge Matviieva found herself in a classic “no-win” position. The case against her is hanging, no formal suspicion has been served. Instead of the defendant’s bench she continues to preside over cases and even travels on foreign business trips. Given such a direct conflict of interest, she was obliged to recuse herself from the case concerning the HACC and NABU. Yet she held the hearing. The judge is, literally, under someone else’s influence.
Meanwhile at the High Council of Justice: double standards ⚖️
While some judges calmly ignore conflicts of interest, others immediately get “swept up” for the same.
It became known that the Council opened disciplinary proceedings against Judge Yushkov. The pretext — an official complaint from a member of the High Qualification Commission of Judges, Oleksiy Omelyan. Yushkov is accused specifically of sins related to conflict of interest.
Why does the system operate so selectively? Some judges are shielded from disciplinary action due to a “lack of materials,” while others are instantly targeted over complaints from top officials. Judicial reform in all its glory.
❗️OFFICE OF CLEANSING ⚖️ SEND NEWS
🚀 Read more on our FaceBook…
Telegram publication
