Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
4,5 million to a judge-daughter from an ex-tax official: so what happens next in this story?😏
And who among the tax official’s circle is involved now?
Almost 4,5 million UAH in cash gifts, a Mercedes worth 5,5 million UAH, apartments, land plots, and a criminal trail of the father. The Denysiuk family continues to surprise with its wealth. But there are still few answers about the source of the money.
Reminder: on 21 August 2026, Kharkiv Region Commercial Court judge Tetiana Denysiuk received from her father Stanislav Denysiuk 4 467 000 UAH. And it was official — the gift was declared.
But there is a nuance.
Stanislav Denysiuk is a former head of the Kharkiv tax administration, who in 2017 was detained in connection with an investigation of large-scale tax schemes from the Yanukovych era. The investigation linked him to possible state losses of 308 million UAH.
And the daughter also has a complicated judicial history. Tetiana Denysiuk was charged in a case concerning a ruling in favor of the company Karpatnadrainvest, associated with former MP Oleksandr Onyshchenko. She was acquitted twice by the High Anti-Corruption Court (HACC), and in September 2026 the Supreme Court finally left the acquittal in force.
Against this background, quite specific questions arise.
Did the NACP verify the origin of the 4,467 million UAH that the father gave his daughter?😏
With what official incomes can Stanislav Denysiuk confirm accumulating such a sum?
With what funds did the family purchase the Mercedes-Benz GLS 450 D worth over 5,5 million UAH, which the judge uses and whose declared owner is Iryna Denysiuk?
Where did the funds for real estate come from, in particular for an apartment in Kyiv of 114,7 m², registered as owned by Denysiuk senior?
And finally, how did the criminal case against the former head of the tax administration conclude?
Of course, a father has the right to give money to his daughter. Even millions. But when it involves a former head of the tax administration and a sitting judge, the public has the right to ask where that money came from.
It is especially interesting whether tax authorities, the NACP, and law enforcement examined the donor’s financial capacity. Declaring millions is one thing; documenting their lawful origin is another.
Vykryvach believes this story deserves a substantive NACP review, in particular regarding the donor’s financial capacity and the origin of the declared assets.
And the most interesting question is not even who gave whom the millions. It is whether they will be able to documentably explain where they came from😏
Subscribe | Vykryvach
Telegram publication
