Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
And how will these competitions differ fundamentally from the current competitions for SAP?
They won't.
Completely controlled competitive procedures by the leadership of the anti-corruption prosecutor's office that allowed four friends of Klymenko to become prosecutors. One of these prosecutors failed to get into SAP four times and only after Klymenko became the head did he miraculously secure the position. And a year later, having shown no results, he was even given a leadership post.
The competition commission for SAP currently consists of six members — three SAP prosecutors and three representatives of NGOs that are complimentary to Klymenko.
At one time, a candidate had to go through three circles of hell before being declared the winner of the competition.
Now, after forming such commission compositions, you can often hear absolutely childish questions asked of candidates like, "What will you do if the staff doesn't listen to you?".
Particularly notable are the representatives of those same NGOs, who do not really know or understand the essence of criminal procedure, and so ask utterly superficial, at times even ridiculous, questions.