Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
Just think about what the head of an entire anti-corruption prosecutor's office is saying.
He wants to improve the process not to ensure respect for human rights and freedoms, not to ensure legality, not to strengthen the guarantees of a fair trial.
In his view, the Criminal Procedure Code should be improved to "demonstrate the success of the anti-corruption system by bringing people to account." ⟦KEEP_A⟧
Since when did the system's "success" become the driving force for adopting changes to legislation?
Notice that no one is even considering the possibility of the court handing down an acquittal.
Quicker consideration, quicker sentencing, quicker to prison, and then shout about some kind of success of the system.
And those who don't have money for Sternenko's fund will be the ones who end up jailed.
The modern Kaufman, Granovsky, Zlochevsky will not go to prison.
All of this will ultimately lead to nothing good.
History has repeatedly shown that such quasi-"successful systems" do not last long.
P.S. the background music is boring, next time you can play some R&B.
Telegram publication
