Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
They have driven the situation around posting bail in Ukraine to the point of absurdity.
This is the consequence of the actions of those who turned this process into an online show.
The CPC, Zheleznyak, and others from that same cohort.
Now we have the result of that practice.
This is a letter from a bank to a lawyer.
In addition to the documents required to verify the source of the funds, the bank demands an explanation of why the bail is being posted by the lawyer rather than by relatives of the suspect, what his “economic and personal interest” consists of, and why he decided to post bail specifically for this client.
So the bank no longer limits itself to financial monitoring, but attempts to intrude into the motives and the nature of the lawyer’s relationship with the client.
The Criminal Procedure Code does not provide any obligation to justify personal interest or to explain why relatives are not posting the bail.
The motives for such a decision may pertain to personal and professional relationships into which the bank is not authorized to intervene without proper grounds.
As a result, a right explicitly provided by the Criminal Procedure Code is effectively made dependent on explanations that the law does not require.
Don’t teach a fool to pray to God.
Telegram publication
