🔥Another disgrace from Avtomaydan’s back office with the official name “High Council of Justice.” ❌4 after months of...

🔥Another disgrace from Avtomaydan’s back office with the official name “High Council of Justice.”

❌4 after months of considering a petition to take measures to protect the authority of the judiciary in the context of the well-known, essentially subversive activity of pseudo-activists such as Zhernakov and Co. in the judicial sphere, the latter issued a conclusion that there are no grounds to take such measures.

❌The author of the conclusion is the questionably known Alla Kotelevets.

👉At the same time, Zhernakov’s unlawful activities are analyzed in detail in the parliamentary temporary investigative commission’s report.

‼️Especially for spineless and narrow-minded members (who want exclusively to do raimovshchyna and receive their sky-high salaries without bothering to understand anything), and who are out of touch and pretend not to be aware of Zhernakov’s unlawful activities, we quote:

The Temporary Investigative Commission at one of its meetings heard three representatives of the Third composition of the GDR. Based on the testimony and explanations received, the TSC established signs of systemic violations in the formation and activities of the GDR:

– the monopolistic influence of a particular public organization that supports the GDR’s activities using international financial assistance, which leads to a violation of the institutional independence of the Council;

– lack of transparency in the process of forming the composition of the GDR, which does not correspond to the principles of openness, trust, professionalism and impartiality, and interference in this process by representatives of certain public organizations, manipulation of the election process during the formation of the GDR’s composition, in particular promoting “desired” candidates, pressure on public representatives, signs of “usurpation of powers” and the creation of conditions for corruption risks;

– application of double standards in assessing judges’ integrity, which calls into question the objectivity of the GDR’s conclusions.

The Temporary Investigative Commission established that the GDR is financially and organizationally critically dependent on one public organization.

Members of the Third composition of the GDR who gave testimony to the TSC, in open public statements, including in the media, reported external influence on the activities of that composition of the GDR.

Thus, the TSC established that out of 19 members of the fourth composition of the GDR at least 13 are representatives of various public organizations, but were in fact delegated by allied NGOs that prearranged the respective lists.

These circumstances during testimony were confirmed to the TSC by the executive director of the public organization whose activities the Commission found to exhibit signs of monopolistic influence on the formation and activities of the GDR (directly from which 7 members out of 8 elected work within the GDR).

It should be emphasized that one public organization has a powerful real

(informal) influence on the GDR’s activities; influence on the HCJ is exercised indirectly through control of the GDR.

The Temporary Investigative Commission established interference by one public organization in the organizational support processes of the GDR, delays in creating the secretariat; blocking or restricting direct contacts of the Council with donors; proposals to conclude a memorandum with de facto restrictions on criticism; attempts to influence the content of the future composition of the GDR through “recommended lists” of candidates; possible actions that could look like behind-the-scenes agreement on future Council members; as well as dissemination of draft ballots with informal markings regarding “desired” and “undesired” candidates. Taken together, these circumstances call into question the GDR’s independence and the transparency of its formation and functioning, and may create risks of conflicts of interest and reduced trust in the mechanisms of public oversight in judicial reform.

🫸But the consideration of the matter in the HCJ, which among these dumb “moo-moo” lasted a minute and a half, looked roughly like this - 🙈🙉🙊.

‼️Another reminder to the judges’ congress: what a disgrace you elected there.

✅Since the HCJ considers Zhernakov’s insulting words normal, under this new standard of freedom of speech we will henceforth call them “f***ing HCJ, stunned by impunity.”