Back
Automatically translated version. May contain inaccuracies compared to the original.
Yesterday HRD published expanded information about the results of its “decade-long” work.
We already explained why a term of 10 years is irrelevant. We will not repeat ourselves.
Instead, we will analyze other aspects of the “decade report.”
We will quote HRD:
“Today HRD is not just 20 volunteers, but a structured analytical organization:
Structure: 2 co-coordinators, 20 Council members, divided into 4 specialized collegia.
A powerful Secretariat: HRD is supported by a team of professionals — 4 senior analysts, 6 analysts, 2 lawyers, a data analyst, an IT specialist, an expert in dissertation analysis, and a communications specialist.
A single digital ecosystem: all of the Council’s work is now fully digitized and has a secure environment. Working registries of candidates, LegalTrack for monitoring legal analysis by lawyers, meeting calendars, and analytical dashboards operate in real time.”
That is, 36 people work on judicial and candidate dossiers every month.
If you exclude the communications specialist and IT specialist from 36, who do not directly analyze dossiers, you get 34 people.
If you look at HRD’s results in the third quarter, you get the following figures:
July: 28 documents
August: 30 documents
September: 20 documents
We remind you again: this is all for 34 people.
So 2,3 documents per 1 person per quarter. Or 0,75 documents per month.
We also remind you that the known minimum salary for this is 1 thousand dollars.
Although our previous analysis of declarations showed other figures. For example, some HRD members declared 3–4 thousand dollars per month.
But even if the average salary is 2 thousand dollars per month, that means a person who produces 0,75 documents per month would receive it.
Is that really an effective use of donor aid during the war?
And that doesn’t even count the sums that DEJURE keeps for administering grants issued to administer HRD and for holding pompous conferences.
If you add those sums as well, a reasonable question arises: shouldn’t that money be directed, for example, to supporting the military? Or to treating the wounded? Or to drones? Or to interceptors for Russian drones?
The list can go on for a long time.
However, the following is clear: the DEJURE Foundation has long since turned HRD into a very profitable business.
Does that suit everyone?
Telegram publication
